<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Shags Hypocrisy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sguy.net/2006/04/26/two-shags-hypocrisy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sguy.net/2006/04/26/two-shags-hypocrisy/</link>
	<description>the weblog of Steve Guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:13:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.sguy.net/2006/04/26/two-shags-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sguy.net/2006/04/26/two-shags-hypocrisy/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think so and I&#039;ll explain why:
In the article you quoted, I was reacting to the NOTW/Sun coverage on Simon Hughes&#039; sexuality. To my knowledge, Simon had never publicly attacked or criticised others for their sexuality. In this piece, I was highlighting the fact that John Prescott had previously used the sexual shennanigans of other politicians as material for his conference speeches - hence he was a hypocrite! (I really don&#039;t care who he&#039;s been sleeping with at all)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think so and I&#8217;ll explain why:<br />
In the article you quoted, I was reacting to the NOTW/Sun coverage on Simon Hughes&#8217; sexuality. To my knowledge, Simon had never publicly attacked or criticised others for their sexuality. In this piece, I was highlighting the fact that John Prescott had previously used the sexual shennanigans of other politicians as material for his conference speeches &#8211; hence he was a hypocrite! (I really don&#8217;t care who he&#8217;s been sleeping with at all)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.sguy.net/2006/04/26/two-shags-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sguy.net/2006/04/26/two-shags-hypocrisy/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>But is it hypocritical to publish this about Prescott when previous entries containing sentiments such as &quot;Perhaps you would like it if we poked around in your private life!&quot; and &quot;Certain sections of the press love a whiff of a sex scandal concerning a politician. It certainly goes with the territory in public life. We are all guilty of fuelling this: when the sex scandal breaks out in a rival party, we throw a party. We love to see the ritual humiliation when it happens to an Archer or a Blunkett. But when it’s our own party in the firing line, we see the cynicism of it all.&quot;

Yet another example of Lib Dems saying one thing and doing something completely different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But is it hypocritical to publish this about Prescott when previous entries containing sentiments such as &#8220;Perhaps you would like it if we poked around in your private life!&#8221; and &#8220;Certain sections of the press love a whiff of a sex scandal concerning a politician. It certainly goes with the territory in public life. We are all guilty of fuelling this: when the sex scandal breaks out in a rival party, we throw a party. We love to see the ritual humiliation when it happens to an Archer or a Blunkett. But when it’s our own party in the firing line, we see the cynicism of it all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet another example of Lib Dems saying one thing and doing something completely different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.sguy.net/2006/04/26/two-shags-hypocrisy/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sguy.net/2006/04/26/two-shags-hypocrisy/#comment-291</guid>
		<description>But is it hypocritical to publish previous entries containing sentiments such as &quot;Perhaps you would like it if we poked around in your private life!&quot; and &quot;Certain sections of the press love a whiff of a sex scandal concerning a politician. It certainly goes with the territory in public life. We are all guilty of fuelling this: when the sex scandal breaks out in a rival party, we throw a party. We love to see the ritual humiliation when it happens to an Archer or a Blunkett. But when it’s our own party in the firing line, we see the cynicism of it all.&quot;

Yet another example of Lib Dems saying one thing and doing something completely different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But is it hypocritical to publish previous entries containing sentiments such as &#8220;Perhaps you would like it if we poked around in your private life!&#8221; and &#8220;Certain sections of the press love a whiff of a sex scandal concerning a politician. It certainly goes with the territory in public life. We are all guilty of fuelling this: when the sex scandal breaks out in a rival party, we throw a party. We love to see the ritual humiliation when it happens to an Archer or a Blunkett. But when it’s our own party in the firing line, we see the cynicism of it all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet another example of Lib Dems saying one thing and doing something completely different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

